ende
Home
Carsten's best article
asd
Research ImpactUser Research
08.11.2024

Why Most Products Fail: The Missing Link of User Understanding

Having led digital transformation initiatives across major European retail organizations, I've learned that measuring UX research impact isn't just about metrics—it's about driving fundamental business transformation through customer understanding.

Author
Image of Carsten Goers
Carsten GörsSenior Consultant
In this article

Discover eye-opening insights on UX research and product discovery in the leefs newsletter!

By submitting the form, I agree to allow leefs CX GmbH to store and process my personal data and I agree to receive newsletter and other communications.

is subscribed

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Proin morbi mattis quisque ac libero sed. Pellentesque faucibus nulla tristique ultricies et tempus dictum.

-- Anne, CEO & Founder leefs

According to a sobering study by Harvard Business School, 95% of new products launched each year fail. Even more striking: of the $1.3 trillion spent annually on digital transformation initiatives, an estimated $900 billion goes to waste. Behind these staggering numbers lies a fundamental truth that most business leaders overlook: product success isn't about features—it's about understanding users.

The Common Misconception

Many executives believe their products fail due to poor execution, inadequate marketing, or fierce competition. While these factors play a role, they're often symptoms of a deeper problem: a fundamental disconnect between what companies build and what users actually need. This disconnect stems from a deeply rooted belief that internal expertise alone can guide product development—a belief that continues to cost companies millions in failed initiatives.

The Traditional Product Development Trap

The Feature-First Fallacy

Walk into most product planning meetings, and you'll hear discussions centered around features, technologies, and timelines. Teams pride themselves on shipping new capabilities quickly, measuring success by the volume of releases rather than their impact. This feature-first mindset creates a dangerous illusion of progress while potentially driving the product further from market fit.

When Internal Assumptions Meet Market Reality

Consider the cautionary tale of Quibi, which burned through $1.75 billion before shutting down in just six months. Despite world-class talent and cutting-edge technology, they built an entire platform on assumptions about how users would consume content—assumptions that proved fatally wrong when confronted with market reality.

The financial impact of failed product development extends far beyond direct costs. A typical enterprise software project costs around $1.3M and ties up vital team resources for six to twelve months. The opportunity cost is devastating: two to three alternative initiatives that could have been pursued, plus a twelve to eighteen-month loss in market position. But more devastating is the compounding effect: teams build on faulty foundations, creating technical debt and organizational inertia that becomes increasingly expensive to correct.

The Four Pillars of User Understanding

Continuous Discovery

User understanding isn't a one-time exercise—it's an ongoing process integrated into every stage of product development. Leading companies like Amazon and Netflix have built entire organizational structures around continuous discovery, enabling them to spot shifting user needs before they become market disruptions. This involves regular user conversations, prototype testing, and behavior pattern monitoring, all orchestrated through cross-functional teams.

Qualitative Depth

While quantitative data tells you what users do, qualitative research reveals why they do it. This deeper understanding is crucial for innovation and problem-solving. Through in-depth user interviews, contextual inquiry, and customer journey mapping, companies gain insights that numbers alone can't provide. These insights often reveal underlying motivations and pain points that quantitative data might miss entirely.

Quantitative Validation

Numbers validate insights and help prioritize opportunities. By combining usage analytics, A/B testing, survey data, and market research, companies can verify their qualitative findings and measure the impact of their decisions. This validation process ensures that product decisions are based on solid evidence rather than gut feelings or individual opinions.

Feedback Loops

Success requires closing the loop between insight and action. Through rapid prototyping, beta testing programs, and iterative development cycles, companies can quickly validate their understanding and adjust course as needed. These feedback loops ensure that user insights directly influence product development, creating a virtuous cycle of improvement.

Real-World Impact: A Case Study

When a leading B2B software company was preparing to invest $4M in a new platform feature, early user research revealed a critical insight: their assumption about user workflow was fundamentally flawed. Instead of proceeding with the planned development, they pivoted to a different solution. The result was transformative: development costs dropped by 60%, user adoption tripled, and revenue exceeded projections by 150%. The total impact was striking—a $150,000 investment in user research generated over $8M in combined cost savings and additional revenue.

Implementation Framework

The path to better user understanding begins with an honest assessment of your current practices. Consider how often your team interacts with users, how research integrates into decision-making, and how quickly you can implement user feedback. This baseline understanding will guide your improvement efforts.

Starting the journey toward better user understanding requires three key phases. First, establish your baseline knowledge by auditing existing user data and identifying critical gaps. Then, build the necessary infrastructure for ongoing research, including contact databases and feedback channels. Finally, develop a consistent research rhythm that keeps user insights flowing into your decision-making process.

Common pitfalls emerge when organizations begin this journey. Many confuse user requests with user needs, over-rely on surveys, or treat research as a mere checkbox exercise. Others fail to act on insights or exclude key stakeholders from the process. Awareness of these pitfalls is the first step in avoiding them.

Taking Action

The journey to better user understanding begins with honest self-reflection. Consider when you last spoke directly with users, how you validate product decisions, and what portion of your recent feature releases were based on user research. These questions will highlight your most pressing opportunities for improvement.

Ready to transform your product development process? We offer a free 90-minute consultation to assess your current user understanding, identify critical knowledge gaps, create a custom research roadmap, and calculate potential ROI. Contact us at [contact@company.com] to schedule your session.

Remember: The most expensive research is the research you don't do—because it leads to building the wrong thing. Start building your user understanding today, and transform your product development from guesswork to groundwork.

Author
Image of Carsten Goers
Carsten GörsSenior Consultant